Control Intelligence

AI Analysis Results

Terminations & OffboardingPayroll & HR

Back to Sub-Process
54
/ 100
Needs Improvement
Overall Sub-Process Rating
Needs ImprovementControl is partially in place or inconsistently operated.
1 control evaluated3 strengths identified3 gaps identified
Executive Summary

The Terminations & Offboarding process exhibits controls that are partially in place or inconsistently operated. Several gaps in design effectiveness and operating consistency were identified that, if left unaddressed, could elevate residual risk beyond the organization's tolerance. Prompt remediation is recommended.

Strengths
  • Terminated employees are removed from payroll within one... has been partially implemented
  • Management review is performed on a regular cadence
  • Exception reporting is generated and reviewed timely
Gaps
  • No automated alerting for control threshold breaches
  • Remediation timelines are not tracked against defined SLAs
  • Evidence of review lacks timestamp and reviewer identity
Recommendations
  1. 1Automate exception detection and route alerts to control owners within 24 hours
  2. 2Develop a remediation tracker with defined SLAs and escalation paths
  3. 3Implement a workflow tool that captures reviewer identity and timestamp for all approvals
Framework Mapping
COSO 2013
Principle P10Principle P11
SOX 404
ICFR.PR.TM.01
IIA Standards 2024
IV.9.2

Control-Level Breakdown (1)

PR-TM-01Needs ImprovementScore: 51/100
Terminated employees are removed from payroll within one pay cycle.
Key Finding

The control is partially implemented but operates inconsistently. Terminated employees are removed from payroll within one pay cycle. Gaps in execution or evidence retention reduce assurance over this area.

Recommendation

Redesign the control to address inconsistencies. Specifically: terminated employees are removed from payroll within one pay cycle. Assign a control owner and establish a testing cadence.

Framework Tags
COSO P10COSO P11ICFR.PR.TM.01IIA IV.9.2